Legal Criticisms of DNA Typing: Where's the Beef?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
DNA Extraction from Beef Harboring Sarcocystis spp.: Comparison of Three Different Analytical Methods
Background: DNA extraction is one the most important steps for molecular analysis of food-borne pathogens. In this research, three methods of DNA extractions from beef harboring Sarcocystis spp. were compared for the quality, quantity, safety, as well as cost-effectiveness. Methods: About 100 mg intersostal and diaphragm were collected from 10 slaughtered cattle. After ensuring their contami...
متن کاملPersonal Identification by DNA Typing
The short tandem repeat (STR) polymorphisms are highly useful tools for personal identification and paternity testing in forensic practice. Sequence analysis of mitochondrial DNA (Mt DNA) is being used to characterize forensic biological specimens, particularly when there is insufficient nuclear DNA in samples for typing. Bones, teeth and other samples that are severely decomposed may be subjec...
متن کاملForensic DNA Typing: Quo Vadis?
Since Alec Jeffreys coined the term “individual-specific genetic fingerprints” in 1985, DNA typing has become indispensable in forensic analysis, having as its central rationale the evidential power of the “match” between trace evidence and suspect. Established technological advances in this field include the adoption of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to generate DNA profiles from minute b...
متن کاملContemporary Criticisms of the Received Wilderness Idea
Names are important. The name “wilderness” is fraught with historical baggage obfuscating the most important role of wilderness areas for contemporary conservation. The received wilderness idea has been and remains a tool of androcentrism, racism, colonialism, and genocide. It privileges virile and primitive recreation, because the main reason wild lands were originally preserved is for such ut...
متن کاملComments on Pullum's Criticisms
We are reasonably convinced by the remarks in Pullum (p. 182) that the sluicing construction, on which the argument in Postal and Langendoen (p. 177) for the non-CFhood of English is based, is not, contrary to what is assumed there, subject to an intrasentential matching condition. Consequently, the argument does not go through. However, we believe that an analogous argument can be given, which...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-)
سال: 1993
ISSN: 0091-4169
DOI: 10.2307/1143889